We thought that all of them followed the same rules and guidelines, regardless of the user’s intent when we first started researching background checks.

We thought that all of them followed the same rules and guidelines, regardless of the user’s intent when we first started researching background checks.

More understanding of our methodology

After conducting about 150 hours of consulting and research with experts, we realized that in an effort to higher assess which companies surpassed the industry standard, we needed to separate background checks into two categories those for work or company purposes and the ones for personal usage.

Criminal record checks conducted for employment purposes are managed by a system of checks and balances, with industry regulators for instance the nationwide Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) and legislation just like the Fair Credit scoring Act (FCRA) providing accreditations and directions. Companies that provide these types of reports are generally very similar in scope, with comparable offerings, and features permitting integration with applicant monitoring systems or apps that are mobile. This sort of check can only just be carried out aided by the subject’s signed agreement.

Personal usage criminal record checks, having said that, can range the gamut from genuine to frankly unethical. To qualify for inclusion within our list, we required that each business be completely transparent about their sources, never make unverifiable claims ( as an example, “it reveals all there was to know of a person, address, e-mail, or phone number»), and provide a fair level of accuracy and updated information, with few gaps in a person’s history.

Leer másWe thought that all of them followed the same rules and guidelines, regardless of the user’s intent when we first started researching background checks.